Re: Benchmarks: Linux Kernel RAID vs a Hardware RAID setup | |
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] | |
Keld Jørn Simonsen wrote:
I would actually welcome more tests with specific user profiles, like many small reads and writes for database use, and concurrent random reading and writing to simulate the load on a server. What bonnie++ is reporting is only equential IO. This is important on work stations, but actually not on servers.
The following is from the Bonnie++ man page:"There are two sections to the program's operations. The first is to test the IO throughput in a fashion that is designed to simulate some types of database applications. The second is to test creation, reading and deleting many small files in a fashion similar to the usage patterns of programs such as Squid or INN."
So I guess the author thinks it's valid for more than sequential I/O.In any case, while we may be in a minority, Justin, I and a few others are interested in sequential I/O, as we build servers required to read and write multiple streams of uncompressed SD and HD video in realtime.
Regards, Richard -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Home] [ATA RAID] [Linux] [Managing RAID on Linux] [Linux IDE] [Linux SCSI] [Linux Hams] [Device-Mapper] [Kernel] [Linux Books] [Linux Admin] [Linux Net] [GFS] [RPM] [Photos] [Yosemite Photos] [Yosemite News] [AMD 64] [Linux Nework]
![]() |