Re: Benchmarks: Linux Kernel RAID vs a Hardware RAID setup | |
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] | |
I would add to that request that you consider using a smaller chunk size. My own benchmarks showed that for some raid levels and layouts, a smaller chunk size gave the best overall performance. On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 11:39 AM, Keld Jørn Simonsen <keld@xxxxxxxx> wrote: ... > It would be interesting if you could enhance your article with benchmarks > on raid10, f2 and o2 layouts. I think they would outperform HW raid, at > least on input. And I would like to see how they perform on outout and > rewrite, with ext3 and xfs. We do have some tests, but many of them are > without a file system layer. -- Jon -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Home] [ATA RAID] [Linux] [Managing RAID on Linux] [Linux IDE] [Linux SCSI] [Linux Hams] [Device-Mapper] [Kernel] [Linux Books] [Linux Admin] [Linux Net] [GFS] [RPM] [Photos] [Yosemite Photos] [Yosemite News] [AMD 64] [Linux Nework]
![]() |