Re: Software RAID1 deadlock in 2.6.25 kernels | |
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] | |
Mike McCarthy wrote:
Bill Davidsen wrote:No. This system and the drives pre-date NCQ. I think NCQ is only implemented in SATA and these are IDE drives. Sometime over the weekend, I am going to reload SUSE 11 and try to do some more debugging.Given heavy 2.6.25 use, my guess is still that the root cause of this is hardware, and that the change in disk code either triggers the hardware problem, or handles it differently. Are you by any chance running NCQ on your system?BTW: It's back to 10.3 (kernel 2.6.22) running happily with a VMware server thrashing away at the disks.
This has recycled back to the top of my todo list, I have a server in mothballs with IDE drives, I'll pull it out, upgrade to FC9 current (non-rawhide) and see if I have any problems. It's off due to lack of need, not really obsolete, so it's a fair test. O'll put a dew hundred GB of raid-1 and beat on it.
-- Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx> "Woe unto the statesman who makes war without a reason that will stillbe valid when the war is over..." Otto von Bismark
-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Home] [ATA RAID] [Linux] [Managing RAID on Linux] [Linux IDE] [Linux SCSI] [Linux Hams] [Device-Mapper] [Kernel] [Linux Books] [Linux Admin] [Linux Net] [GFS] [RPM] [Photos] [Yosemite Photos] [Yosemite News] [AMD 64] [Linux Nework]
![]() |