Re: Grow a RAID-10

["Daniel L. Miller" <dmiller@xxxxxxxxx>]

Keld Jørn Simonsen wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 06:47:31PM -0700, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
>   
> > Keld Jørn Simonsen wrote:
> >     
> > > On Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 02:56:04PM -0700, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
> > >  
> > >       
> > > > I currently have a RAID10 across (4) SATA drives.  It looks like I'm 
> > > > going to need to grow in the near future.  Any tips for a procedure for 
> > > > this?  My current plan:
> > > >
> > > > 1.  Add a PCI SATA controller (MB had 4 SATA + 4 RAID SATA, it's a Tyan 
> > > > MB with a NFORCE chipset, I'm not sure if I want/can use the RAID SATA 
> > > > ports as plain SATA connections).
> > > >    
> > > >         
> > > Why not use the mobo raid sata ports? They are probably faster than a
> > > controller on the pci bus. What kind of pci bus do you have?
> > >
> > >  
> > >       
> > My mistake.  Confused this one with another system.  Only have 4 ports 
> > available.  I did have the option of using the Nvidia RAID - which I did 
> > NOT enable.
> >     
>
> Yes, it is fine not to use the two on-board raid controllers in raid
> mode, but just to use SW raid on them. I have a similar mobo with 2
> sata controllers and the ability to attach 8 sata drives, which I have
> all been using to run SW raid, and I have not experienced any problems
> yet with this setup.
>
> I understand that your mobo has 4 onboard sata connections, and that
> these are already in use for the current array.
>
>   
> > What "kind" of pci bus?  Don't understand the question.  If it matters, 
> > it's a Tyan S2892, a "Thunder K8SE".  nForce Pro2200 and AMD8131 PCI-X 
> > chipsets.
> >     
>
> So it has both PCI-X bus and PCI-E bus. You want to attact 2 more drives 
> and you need a sata controller. This could probably both be attached via
> the PCI-X bus and the PCI-E bus. It seems like the PCI-X bus - with a
> 133 MHz possibility counld be the faster of the 2, but given you will
> only have 2 more drives, both PCI-X and PCI-E are prossibilties.
>
>   
> > > PCI-E 1x is likely to be too slow for a 4-drive raid10,f2 array.
> > > My 4-drive raid10,f2 delivers about 320 MB/s and newer disks should be
> > > able to deliver 360 MB/s - well above the 250 MB/s that a PCI-E 1x can
> > > deliver. 
> > >
> > >  
> > >       
> > > > 2.  Add 2 more drives - not necessarily the same size as the existing 
> > > > (they were all 4 the same)
> > > >
> > > > 3.  Execute "mdadm --grow /dev/md0"
> > > >    
> > > >         
> > > What kind of raid10 do you have?> 
> > >  
> > >       
> > I don't understand this question either.
> >
> > mdadm --detail /dev/md0
> > /dev/md0:
> >        Version : 00.90.03
> >  Creation Time : Tue Oct  3 19:11:53 2006
> >     Raid Level : raid10
> >     Array Size : 312581632 (298.10 GiB 320.08 GB)
> >  Used Dev Size : 156290816 (149.05 GiB 160.04 GB)
> >   Raid Devices : 4
> >  Total Devices : 4
> > Preferred Minor : 0
> >    Persistence : Superblock is persistent
> >
> >    Update Time : Wed Jul  2 18:46:15 2008
> >          State : clean
> > Active Devices : 4
> > Working Devices : 4
> > Failed Devices : 0
> >  Spare Devices : 0
> >
> >         Layout : near=2, far=1
> >     Chunk Size : 32K
> >
> >           UUID : 9d94b17b:f5fac31a:577c252b:0d4c4b2a
> >         Events : 0.10941692
> >
> >    Number   Major   Minor   RaidDevice State
> >       0       8        0        0      active sync   /dev/sda
> >       1       8       16        1      active sync   /dev/sdb
> >       2       8       32        2      active sync   /dev/sdc
> >       3       8       48        3      active sync   /dev/sdd
> >     
>
> I was takling about the layout, and you have a n2 layout (standard
> raid10 - near=2). You may benefit from a raid10,f2 layout, as this has faster 
> read capabilities, but I think it is not possible on the fly to
> rearrange a raid10,n2 array to a raid10,f2 array.
>
> Given that you have a raid10,n2 layout, the speeds of the busses are not
> so important, as raid10,n2 cannot deliver that high performance. 
> I would expect less than 100 MB/s coming out of your 2 extra disks.
>
> What is the use for your raid? is it a database, a file server, a web
> server or the like?
>
> Best regards
> keld
>   

This is our all-in-one server.  The raid is the primary storage for 
everything - day-to-day operations files, quickbooks data, virtual 
machines.  O/S and programs are on a separate non-raid drive.
--
Daniel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html