|
|
|
RAID5 losing initial synchronization on restart when one disk is spare | |
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] | |
Hello According to mdadm's man page: "When creating a RAID5 array, mdadm will automatically create a degraded array with an extra spare drive. This is because building the spare into a degraded array is in general faster than resyncing the parity on a non-degraded, but not clean, array. This feature can be over-ridden with the --force option."Unfortunately, I'm seeing a kind of bug when I create a RAID5 array with an internal bitmap, then stop the array before the initial synchronization is done and restart the array.
1° When I create the array with an internal bitmap: mdadm -C /dev/md_d1 -e 1.2 -l 5 -n 4 -b internal -R /dev/sd?I see the last disk as a spare disk. After the restart of the array, all disks are seen active and the array is not continuing the aborted synchronization!
Note that I did not use the --assume-clean option. 2° When I create the array without a bitmap: mdadm -C /dev/md_d1 -e 1.2 -l 5 -n 4 -R /dev/sd?I see the last disk as a spare disk. After the restart of the array, the spare disk is still a spare disk and the array continues the synchronization where it had stopped.
In the case 1°, is this a bug or did I miss something?Secondly, what could be the consequences of this non-performed synchronization ?
Kernel version: 2.6.26-rc4 mdadm version: 2.6.2 Thanks, Hubert -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Home] [ATA RAID] [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure] [Linux] [Managing RAID on Linux] [Linux IDE] [Linux SCSI] [Linux Hams] [Device-Mapper] [Kernel] [Linux Books] [Linux Admin] [Linux Net] [GFS] [RPM] [Photos] [Yosemite Photos] [Yosemite News] [AMD 64] [Linux Nework]
![]() |
![]() |