questions about softraid limitations | |
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] | |
Hello list, Neil, I have worked on a faulty hw raid card data recovery some days before. The project is already successfully done, but i run into some limitations. For the best safe way first i have jumperd the drives to readonly mode.Than try to build an "old fashion" linear arrays from each disks + 64k another blockdevice. (for store the superblock) But the mdadm refused to _build_ the array, because the source scsi drive is jumpered to readonly. Why? :-)
I try to build the array with --readonly option, but the mdadm still dont understand what i want. (yes, i know, rtfm...)
The next step is: mdadm --create --assume-clean -l 5 /dev/mdX --raid-disks 5 /dev/....(And this step is refused too if the drives or some part of the sources are readonly.)
Its OK, but what about building a readonly raid 5 array for recovery usage only? :-) And _build_ a degraded-readonly raid 4-5-6 is even better if this will ever available....
And i need to set the readonly flag _after_ the --create, but the --create + --assume-clean is logical, and working combination with --readonly.
More additionally, i think the only write the superblocks to the disks, when the --readonly flag is cleared. And more, if the readonly raid 4-5-6 array can handle, and recover the bad sectors from the parity infos.... hmmmm... :-)
These little options can be great help for data recovery, and all is safe. Thanks and regards, Janos Haar -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Home] [ATA RAID] [Linux] [Managing RAID on Linux] [Linux IDE] [Linux SCSI] [Linux Hams] [Device-Mapper] [Kernel] [Linux Books] [Linux Admin] [Linux Net] [GFS] [RPM] [Photos] [Yosemite Photos] [Yosemite News] [AMD 64] [Linux Nework]
![]() |