Re: Autostarting arrays with V1 metadata | |
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] | |
Ben Winslow wrote: > I've noticed that (as of 2.6.25, at least) the kernel doesn't autostart > arrays with V1 metadata. In autostart_arrays(), md_import_device() is > called for 0.90 arrays only, and there's currently no sort of > autodetection of the superblock position for V1 metadata. > > Is this simply a matter of the code being unwritten, or are there other > reasons that V1 arrays aren't autostarted (such as the SB format being > unfinished)? My only real motivation to use V1 metadata is the unhashed > homehost field, which I'll give up if the SB format hasn't stabilized yet. > > Thanks, Also, FYI: http://linux-raid.osdl.org/index.php/Autodetect and http://linux-raid.osdl.org/index.php/RAID_Boot -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Home] [ATA RAID] [Linux] [Managing RAID on Linux] [Linux IDE] [Linux SCSI] [Linux Hams] [Device-Mapper] [Kernel] [Linux Books] [Linux Admin] [Linux Net] [GFS] [RPM] [Photos] [Yosemite Photos] [Yosemite News] [AMD 64] [Linux Nework]
![]() |