On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 01:24:58PM +0200, Karol Babioch wrote:
> Hi,
...
> > Can you try applying the sony-laptop patches on 3.2, boot with
> > acpi_backlight=vendor and see what is the state there?
> It behaves just like 3.3. What might be interesting is 3.1. Here some
> really strange values get returned:
>
> [root@vpcs nv_backlight]# cat actual_brightness brightness max_brightness
...
how about the sony-laptop stuff with 3.1+patches?
What is the output of
$ grep . /sys/class/backlight/*/*
$ grep . /sys/devices/platform/sony-laptop/*
and the kernel log after these two commands
I'm trying to understand is if the patch series I sent works for
you on the last working version of kernel (i.e. 3.1 apparently).
...
> I'm currently trying to reconstruct the last version that worked for me.
> I'm quite sure that "vaio-full-3.0.4.patch" (from here [1]), worked fine
> with the 3.1.x branch. However I've just recompiled 3.1.10 and it
> doesn't seem to work. Anyway it worked without the
> "acpi_backlight=vendor" parameter, so I'm not quite sure whether this is
> of interest for you right now.
it is actually. What did you have in the sony-laptop sysfs directories
when booting with acpi_backlight=vendor?
Thanks!
--
mattia
:wq!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe platform-driver-x86" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Linux USB Devel]
[Video for Linux]
[Linux Audio Users]
[Photo]
[Yosemite News]
[Yosemite Photos]
[Free Online Dating]
[Linux Kernel]
[Linux SCSI]
[XFree86]