Re: Film/Slide Scanner | |
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] | |
Mark writes: : Scanning takes time, but it hardly has to be the only thing you are doing while the scanner is running. I just finished a long delayed scan project of close to 1000 images. It took a couple of weeks, but I would watch TV, read a book ect during the scan time. In other words it was my more or less non productive time anyway. It took that long because my scanner could only hold 6 at a time. I almost used the excuse to get a scanner that would do a full roll of 35mm at one sitting. Then I could start scanning and then go to bed. When I wake up the next morning 6 times the work would have been done. are these negs? I'm confused - so many people have good DSLR's these days yet when it comes to digitising slides they still scan when using any old slide copier would be *so* much quicker and give results as good as their wonderful dslr can take Since getting my first DSLR I have not and cannot imagine firing up the scanner for anything less than 4x5 chromes or negs mind you, as soon as I get the mask sorted and can work a good way to shoot negs and reverse/demask them, I'll be doing that by digicam too k
[Home] [Share Photos] [Photos] [Bryce] [Rail] [Hand Exposure Meters] [Epson Inkjet] [Scanner List] [Nikon D90] [Digital Cameras] [6 Megapixels & Up] [Kitty's Korners] [Photo Editing Software] [Night Vision] [Gimp Users] [Gimp for Windows] [Film Scanners] [Mac OS X Leopard]