Re: Interesting (scary) article. | |
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] | |
Roger On 18 Apr 2008, at 2:24 PM, Rich Mason wrote:
We have a winner! Sort of. It looks to me like the photo was made into a mirror and the writing should be reversed. It could have been done with software, but it seems the software was used to "correct" it so it would read properly.It's funny to see that sort of manipulation accompanying an article on how photographers are being manipulated by law enforcement.Cheers, Rich On Apr 18, 2008, at 9:28 AM, Don Roberts wrote:The photo appears to have been shot into a mirror but the lettering on the lens reads correctly. That can't be done by just flipping the pic with software. Is that what you mean?Don Rich Mason wrote:Bonus points for anyone who can tell me what's wrong with the picture that accompanies that article.Cheers, Rich On Apr 18, 2008, at 4:50 AM, jonathan turner wrote:Saw this on the BBC website, thought it may be of interest; http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/em/fr/-/1/hi/technology/7351252.stm Personally all this paranoia makes me hopping mad! ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Jonathan Turner Photographer e: home@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx t: 0113 217 1275 m:07796 470573 7 Scott Hall Walk, Leeds, LS7 3JQ http://www.jonathan-turner.com
[Home] [Share Photos] [Photos] [Bryce] [Rail] [Hand Exposure Meters] [Epson Inkjet] [Scanner List] [Nikon D60] [Digital Cameras] [6 Megapixels & Up] [Kitty's Korners] [Photo Editing Software] [Night Vision] [Gimp Users] [Gimp for Windows] [Film Scanners] [Mac OS X Leopard]