Re: Hasselblad question

Subject: Re: Hasselblad question
From: ADavidhazy <andpph@xxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 15:30:39 -0400
In-reply-to: <15319.10.0.0.130.1208019267.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: School of Photographic Arts and Sciences/RIT
References: <C4265F63.E486%home@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <55EAE47C-2409-49ED-8F51-03F7D35E069A@xxxxxxxxxx> <15319.10.0.0.130.1208019267.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040804 Netscape/7.2

OK - did we cover "F"    F, M, X and V

something to ponder ... by 60+ year olds.

andy

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Hasselblad question
  - From: Per Öfverbeck
- Re: Hasselblad question
  - From: Jim Thyer

References:
- Re: Hasselblad question
  - From: jonathan turner
- Re: Hasselblad question
  - From: Per Öfverbeck
- Re: Hasselblad question
  - From: John Gulliver