Re: pam_chauthok and froozen chain problems

[Thorsten Kukuk <kukuk@xxxxxxx>]

On Mon, Feb 02, Dustin Kirkland wrote:

> > Any ideas/opinions/other choices?
> 
> What about a 3-pass system, as opposed to a 2-pass system?
> 
> Pass 1: assert user is allowed to update
> Pass 2: assert this token is okay
> Pass 3: commit
> 
> Rather than freezing the chain after the 1st pass, freeze it after the second?

Which would mean you need to rewrite all existing PAM modules.
That's not an option.

  Thorsten

-- 
Thorsten Kukuk, Project Manager/Release Manager SLES
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, D-90409 Nuernberg
GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nuernberg)

_______________________________________________
Pam-list mailing list
Pam-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pam-list