Re: pam + tacacs configuration

[Dan Yefimov <dan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 02.10.2008 1:52, Nick Owen wrote:
> Greetings:
>
> I am trying to get pam_tacplus 1.2.9 working with pam-0.99.6.2-3.22.fc6.
>   I had this working back in the pam_stack days, but can't seem to get it
> quite right using include.
>
> here is my /etc/pam.d/tacacs file:
>
> #%PAM-1.0
> auth       sufficient   /lib/security/pam_tacplus.so debug
> server=10.100.0.102 secret=super_secret encrypt
> account    sufficient   /lib/security/pam_tacplus.so debug
> server=10.100.0.102 secret=super_secret encrypt service=shell protocol=ssh
> session    sufficient   /lib/security/pam_tacplus.so debug
> server=10.100.0.102 secret=super_secret encrypt service=shell protocol=ssh
>
> Here's my /etc/pam.d/sshd:
>
> #%PAM-1.0
> auth       include      tacacs
> #auth       required     pam_nologin.so
> account    include      tacacs
> #account    required     system-auth
> password   required     tacacs
             ^^^^^^^^
Here is the root of your problem :-)

> session    include      tacacs
> #session    required     system-auth
> #session    required     pam_limits.so
> #session    optional     pam_console.so
>
> And here's the output from /var/log/secure:
>
> Oct  1 17:21:40 vpn sshd[22767]: PAM unable to dlopen(/lib/security/tacacs)
> Oct  1 17:21:40 vpn sshd[22767]: PAM [error: /lib/security/tacacs:
> cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory]
> Oct  1 17:21:40 vpn sshd[22767]: PAM adding faulty module:
> /lib/security/tacacs
[skip]

> I can't seem to google up any info on configuring with modules using
> include. The logs seem to point to tacacs being in the wrong place. I
> also wonder if the source for tacplus needs to be updated.
You just forgot to replace 'required' with 'include' and didn't notice that :-)
--

Sincerely Your, Dan.

_______________________________________________
Pam-list mailing list
Pam-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pam-list