Re: Pam-list Digest, Vol 38, Issue 4

[Andrew Morgan <morgan@xxxxxxxxxx>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Andreas Schindler wrote:
> To the discussion about PAM_DISPLAY: Before all, please consider that
> every X-Display on a local machine (i.e. DISPLAY=x.x or localhost:x.x)
> ALWAYS has an associatet TTY, because the X-Server needs a (pseudo-)device
> to attach to. So, PAM_TTY and PAM_DISPLAY should be independent of each
> other.

Did you consider this X display?

  (vncserver < /dev/null 2>&1 > /dev/null)

The use of PAM_TTY is primarily for the application to communicate to
modules where the user input/output is coming from/going to, in the case
of X, a remote display's underlying terminal (a la vncviewer) might
change at random many times during the life of a vncserver session.

Cheers

Andrew
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFGIwpMQheEq9QabfIRAttGAKCO9m+M0/AMu3h/1EsriQU0VEySHQCgiJkB
ahN09Xj03zYWLxwwRE4mJpc=
=SbnF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
Pam-list mailing list
Pam-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pam-list