| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] |
On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 06:54:42AM +0530, Opesh Alkara wrote:
> Please excuse my limited knowledge on PAM. I want to have kind of setup
> where all my linux users connect to system using their non-wheel usernames
> and then su to a specific user 'userA'. this specific userA is a user by
> which production application runs on Linux RHEL ES 3.0 and 4.0.
>
> Now that each of the users have logged and su - to userA, I would like to
> know whether commands executed as userA can be logged?
> I know I may sound foolish here, nonetheless I feel PAM with SUDO would have
> got this flexibility.
this is not really a pam thing.
sudo does provide logging, but it only logs the command that is being
immediately executed. if you execute, say, /bin/bash, then all that
will be logged is that you executed /bin/bash. you will *not* see any
logs that indicate what commands were run under bash itself. to get
everything, you would need to install a tty sniffer or put logging code
in the shell or turn on process accounting or something like that.
i am unclear on whether you are already aware that su and sudo are
different things; both can be configured to log some stuff. both can be
configured to log session-opened and session-closed. (this is a
function of pam.) for logging the commands, though, you would be
looking for some kind of application-specific configuration. i suspect
that most versions of su would not have such a thing, but sudo
definitely does.
--
Ed Schmollinger - schmolli@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx - http://frozencrow.org/
_______________________________________________
Pam-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pam-list
_______________________________________________ Pam-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pam-list
[Home] [Kernel List] [Red Hat Install] [Linux for the blind] [Red Hat Watch List] [Gimp] [Kerberos: The Definitive Guide]
![]() |
![]() |