[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Only 1 line in pam.d files should be a "sufficient"? (rest required?)

To: Pluggable Authentication Modules <pam-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Only 1 line in pam.d files should be a "sufficient"? (rest required?)
From: Christian Seberino <seberino@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2006 12:42:04 -0800
Reply-to: Pluggable Authentication Modules <pam-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: pam-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx

It seems that "sufficient" lines like pam_unix.so don't cause
authentication to ever FAIL.  So should only 1 line be a "sufficient"
like pam_unix line?

Chris

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________

Pam-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pam-list

Prev by Date: Re: why "auth sufficient pam_deny.so" accepts *ANY AND ALL* passwords!?!??
Next by Date: User Change Password Issues
Previous by thread: why pam_tally never updates failed login count?
Next by thread: User Change Password Issues
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Home] [Kernel List] [Red Hat Install] [Linux for the blind] [Red Hat Watch List] [Gimp] [Kerberos: The Definitive Guide]

Add to Google

Powered by Linux