[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

confused about "sufficient" vs. "required"

To: pam-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: confused about "sufficient" vs. "required"
From: Christian Seberino <seberino@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 15:18:05 -0800
Reply-to: Pluggable Authentication Modules <pam-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: pam-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx

I'm confused about "sufficient" because docs
suggest it can override a failed "required" test!

What is usefulness of a "required" if a "sufficient"
can override it?

Chris

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________

Pam-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pam-list

Follow-Ups:
- Re: confused about "sufficient" vs. "required"
  - From: Tomas Mraz

Prev by Date: Re: pam_login_access vs. pam_access
Next by Date: help! pam.d and pam_tally setting mess up xscreensaver login!!!!
Previous by thread: unsubscribe
Next by thread: Re: confused about "sufficient" vs. "required"
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Home] [Kernel List] [Red Hat Install] [Linux for the blind] [Red Hat Watch List] [Gimp] [Kerberos: The Definitive Guide]

&nsp;

Powered by Linux