On Mar 18, 2011 12:03 PM, "Eric Brunner-Williams"
<ebw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:ebw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
I'm assuming that the phrase "counter-communication" refers to
interaction at an institutional "counter", and sensitive data is
communicated, e.g., personally identifying information and
pharmaceutical prescriptions or banking identifiers, etc.
Is this a correct assumption?
Thanks in advance,
Eric
On 3/16/11 9:04 PM, IETF Secretariat wrote:
A new IETF non-working group email list has been created.
List address: obscurity-interest@xxxxxxxx
<mailto:obscurity-interest@xxxxxxxx>
Archive: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/obscurity-interest/
To subscribe:
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/obscurity-interest
Description: This list is for discussion of the requirements and
technology for enabling communications, especially near or
real-time,
between persons subject to high levels of counter-communication
interception. The requirements are believed to relate to
privacy, data
integrity, unlinkability, and the general intercept (lawful or
otherwise)
problem, which is broader than the "privacy" problem considered
by IETF.
This list intended to focus on practical requirement and
actionable work
rather than general theory. Discussion may lead to new protocol
action,
enhanced guidance for "security considerations" sections in IETF
specifications, and further research inside or outside of the IETF.
For additional information, please contact the list administrators.
_______________________________________________
IETF-Announce mailing list
IETF-Announce@xxxxxxxx <mailto:IETF-Announce@xxxxxxxx>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
_______________________________________________
obscurity-interest mailing list
obscurity-interest@xxxxxxxx <mailto:obscurity-interest@xxxxxxxx>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/obscurity-interest
