Re: [obscurity-interest] Prague face-to-face scheduling
|[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]|
I confess I did not have that particular definition in mind, but it certainly represents an interesting use case.
On Mar 18, 2011 12:03 PM, "Eric Brunner-Williams" <ebw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I'm assuming that the phrase "counter-communication" refers to interaction at an institutional "counter", and sensitive data is communicated, e.g., personally identifying information and pharmaceutical prescriptions or banking identifiers, etc.
Is this a correct assumption?
Thanks in advance,
On 3/16/11 9:04 PM, IETF Secretariat wrote:
A new IETF non-working group email list has been created.
List address: obscurity-interest@xxxxxxxx
To subscribe: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/obscurity-interest
Description: This list is for discussion of the requirements and
technology for enabling communications, especially near or real-time,
between persons subject to high levels of counter-communication
interception. The requirements are believed to relate to privacy, data
integrity, unlinkability, and the general intercept (lawful or otherwise)
problem, which is broader than the "privacy" problem considered by IETF.
This list intended to focus on practical requirement and actionable work
rather than general theory. Discussion may lead to new protocol action,
enhanced guidance for "security considerations" sections in IETF
specifications, and further research inside or outside of the IETF.
For additional information, please contact the list administrators.
IETF-Announce mailing list
obscurity-interest mailing list
_______________________________________________ obscurity-interest mailing list obscurity-interest@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/obscurity-interest