|
|
|
Re: [Celinux-dev] [Q] TinyLinux project status (resend) | |
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] | |
Hi, 2012/4/24 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri <barbieri@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: >> It seems Linux is not aiming that low after all, however a little >> effort to try to un-bloat the current >> state of things can't hurt, right? > > Do you know the state of uCLinux, when those options are enabled it > should be better, no? Or 1.5Mb is with such options? To avoid confusion: uclinux is basically a linux distribution; it is made of a linux kernel and a filesystem. The kernel included in latest uclinux distribution file is 3.x series, and it is pretty much equally to a vanilla kernel (as compiled from git). So, when compiling for m68k (coldfire) with just the bare minimum options enabled: block layer, console drivers, romfs, I got a 1.5 MB kernel. I was shocked by the bigness of the number, but it doesn't seem to be easily reduced. And we are not even talking about dynamic footprint, or filesystem requirements! _______________________________________________ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
[Newbies FAQ] [Linux Kernel Development] [IETF Annouce] [Git] [Networking] [Security] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Yosemite] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux Networking] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Linux ACPI]
![]() |
![]() |