Re: IRQs and memory consistency

[Christopher Harvey <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 10.04.2012 19:58, Wink Saville wrote:
> Sounds to me like there needs to be a flush of the processor cache
> by using memory barriers.

I used a wmb(); right after I set the value I wanted.

> I'm guessing that the IRQ is taken on a different thread and possibly
> a different processor and the value needs to be flushed. You might
> try having devid be an atomic_t and then use atomic_set
> and atomic_read so that the "proper" memory barriers are used.

should I use atomic ops instead of a wmb?
The interrupt can't happen until the value is assigned completely in 
one thread. I'm sure.


_______________________________________________
Kernelnewbies mailing list
Kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies