|
|
|
[QUESTION] staging/easycap fix | |
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] | |
Hi,
I'm try to fix staging/easycap driver. I know it has some bugs
somewhere (I've seen some panics while using the device) but
I wanted to improve the code style before debugging it. In the
meantime, I expect to develop a better understanding of the code.
However, I want know if I am in the right direction; so I want to know
if this is ok:
1. mainly I am splitting very large functions into smaller parts. For
instance, xxx_probe function is +1k lines long, so I'm
splitting it up to make the code cleaner, more readable. Is this ok?
2. second, I am fixing some style issues (besides checkpatch), for
instance "if" syntax:
- if (0 == bInterfaceNumber) {
+ if (bInterfaceNumber == 0) {
and ugly comments like:
-/*---------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
-/*
- * GET PROPERTIES OF PROBED INTERFACE
- */
-/*---------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
+
+ /*
+ * GET PROPERTIES OF PROBED INTERFACE
+ */
So, Am I on the right track?
Thanks,
Ezequiel.
_______________________________________________
Kernelnewbies mailing list
Kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
[Newbies FAQ] [Linux Kernel Development] [IETF Annouce] [Git] [Networking] [Security] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Yosemite] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux Networking] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Linux ACPI]
![]() |
![]() |