|
|
|
RE: two netcard configed in one subnet problem | |
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] | |
|
> Just curious, are you enabling IP forwarding in A? Or bridging or something?
I am not enabling IP forwarding in A. no bridging . I haven't set som special network configuration. > From: mulyadi.santosa@xxxxxxxxx > Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 12:18:17 +0700 > Subject: Re: two netcard configed in one subnet problem > To: duanshuidao@xxxxxxxxxxx > CC: kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Hi.... > > On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 09:16, hu jun <duanshuidao@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > then I unplug eth1 , ethtool eth1 show "Link detected: no", > > > > now on B :ping 192.168.160.11 and 192.168.160.21, both are ok, too. > > Maybe the thing that happen is that when you ping eth1 of A from B, > the flow is: B send ICMP--> A' eth0 receives it--> forward it to eth1 > > Eth1, in my humble opinion, is not really answering "by hardware", but > just it's network stack. Since you made eth0 and eth1 under the same > broadcast address, the effect is like you were doing bonding between > eth0+eth1 in A. > > Just curious, are you enabling IP forwarding in A? Or bridging or something? > > > -- > regards, > > Mulyadi Santosa > Freelance Linux trainer and consultant > > blog: the-hydra.blogspot.com > training: mulyaditraining.blogspot.com > > _______________________________________________ > Kernelnewbies mailing list > Kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies |
_______________________________________________ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
[Newbies FAQ] [Linux Kernel Development] [IETF Annouce] [Git] [Networking] [Security] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Yosemite] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux Networking] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Linux ACPI]
![]() |
![]() |