Re: Virtual addresses below 0x8048000

["Sandeep K Sinha" <sandeepksinha@xxxxxxxxx>]

Its used for dll's.

On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 9:36 PM, Vivek Kutal <vivekutal@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> What could be the rationale behind not using addresses 0x0 - 0x08048000 in
>> previous versions. Kernel version  2.4  also shows libc to be at address
>> 0x40xxxxxx i.e. above 1GB address
>>
> I tried to find the reason for this a few years back , but the only answer
> that I got was , its because of some historical reasons :)
>
>
> --
> Vivek Kutal
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send an email with
> "unsubscribe kernelnewbies" to ecartis@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Please read the FAQ at http://kernelnewbies.org/FAQ
>
>



-- 
Regards,
Sandeep.






"To learn is to change. Education is a process that changes the learner."

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send an email with
"unsubscribe kernelnewbies" to ecartis@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Please read the FAQ at http://kernelnewbies.org/FAQ