Re: Virtual addresses below 0x8048000 | |
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] | |
What could be the rationale behind not using addresses 0x0 - 0x08048000 in previous versions. Kernel version 2.4 also shows libc to be at address 0x40xxxxxx i.e. above 1GB addressI tried to find the reason for this a few years back , but the only answer that I got was , its because of some historical reasons :)
-- Vivek Kutal -- To unsubscribe from this list: send an email with "unsubscribe kernelnewbies" to ecartis@xxxxxxxxxxxx Please read the FAQ at http://kernelnewbies.org/FAQ
[Newbies FAQ] [Kernel List] [Site Home] [IETF Annouce] [Git] [Networking] [Security] [Bugtraq] [Rubini] [Photo] [Yosemite] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux Networking] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Linux ACPI] [DDR & Rambus] [UNIX Filesystems] [Linux Resources]
|
|