RE: EXPORT_SYMBOL Vs extern? | |
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] | |
Hi, > > Is it a compulsion for a function which need to be used in any other > source file, exported through EXPORT_SYMBOL only? > Does this means all the places in kernel(and there are loads of > them), where a function is non-static and is used in other source > files should actually be using EXPORT_SYMBOL? > EXPORT_SYMBOL is mandatory if you want to use a kernel defined function in a module (or vice versa), or a module defined function in a different module. You can use a non-static function (defined in say A.obj) in a different obj file (defined in say B.obj) provide that both the objs either belong to the same module, or are linked in the kernel at the compile time. Thanks, Rajat -- To unsubscribe from this list: send an email with "unsubscribe kernelnewbies" to ecartis@xxxxxxxxxxxx Please read the FAQ at http://kernelnewbies.org/FAQ
[Newbies FAQ] [Kernel List] [Site Home] [IETF Annouce] [Git] [Networking] [Security] [Bugtraq] [Rubini] [Photo] [Yosemite] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux Networking] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Linux ACPI] [DDR & Rambus] [UNIX Filesystems] [Linux Resources]
![]() |