Re: why kernel use git instead of CVS or SVN

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: why kernel use git instead of CVS or SVN
From: Scott Lovenberg <scott.lovenberg@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 04 May 2008 04:38:44 -0400
Cc: kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <000a01c8adb9$c1cf4340$3d2c3b74@sofia>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Windows/20080421)

vichy wrote:

Dear all:
Right now the kernel and Xorg is maintained by git rather than SVN or CVS.
Would someone tell me the reason why the kernel repository uses git?
Thanks a lot,
vichy


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send an email with
"unsubscribe kernelnewbies" to ecartis@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Please read the FAQ at http://kernelnewbies.org/FAQ

Linus explains it in his intro, IIRC.
YouTube - Tech Talk: Linus Torvalds on git

Follow-Ups:
- Re: why kernel use git instead of CVS or SVN
  - From: Mulyadi Santosa

References:
- why kernel use git instead of CVS or SVN
  - From: vichy

Prev by Date: Re: why kernel use git instead of CVS or SVN
Next by Date: Stack at high memory locations
Previous by thread: Re: why kernel use git instead of CVS or SVN
Next by thread: Re: why kernel use git instead of CVS or SVN
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Newbies FAQ] [Kernel List] [Site Home] [IETF Annouce] [Git] [Networking] [Security] [Bugtraq] [Rubini] [Photo] [Yosemite] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux Networking] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Linux ACPI] [DDR & Rambus] [UNIX Filesystems] [Linux Resources]

Add to Google

Powered by Linux