Re: [RFC net-next 0/2] net: Use net_<level>_ratelimit

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 14:24 -0400, David Miller wrote:

> > But don't you have to do something in the sources to actually get
> > dynamic_debug enabled? I'm concerned this will make mac80211 debugging
> > inconsistent - the normal bits are just printk() still, and the
> > rate-limited bits need some special enabling? That seems odd.
> 
> You can turn them all off or on with a simple flip of a boolean switch
> at run-time.  Or, alternatively, you can turn them on or off in a
> finer grained manner with other run-time facilities.
> 
> There should be a transition away from explicit KERN_DEBUG.

I support that, but I think it's confusing to have things mixed. Also,
we seem to have printk_ratelimit(), so I'd prefer to have that used in
mac80211 instead until everything there moves over to newer facilities.

johannes

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Linux Resources]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Consulting]     [Free Internet Dating]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Photo]

Add to Google Powered by Linux