- Subject: Re: [Bridge] [PATCH 2/3] netfilter: potential null derefence.
- From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2012 10:11:53 +0100
- Cc: santosh nayak <santoshprasadnayak@xxxxxxxxx>, netfilter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, coreteam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, bridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kernel-janitors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, bart.de.schuymer@xxxxxxxxxx, netfilter-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, shemminger@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <4F513C2B.6030604@pandora.be>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 10:31:23PM +0100, Bart De Schuymer wrote:
> Op 1/03/2012 13:30, Pablo Neira Ayuso schreef:
> >On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 02:47:14PM +0530, santosh nayak wrote:
> >>From: Santosh Nayak<santoshprasadnayak@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>
> >>I am getting following error.
> >>" net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c:269 ebt_do_table()
> >> error: potential null derefence 'cs'"
> >>
> >> i = cs[sp].n; // If cs == Null then this will cause problem.
> >
> >Very sorry, I didn't see the out label.
> >
> >I'll apply this to my nf [1] once David takes my previous request for
> >pulling.
> >
>
> Hi,
>
> Has this patch been tested? Really, that code in the core firewall
> function is there for a reason, wouldn't you think?
> The chainstack is only allocated when user-defined chains are used
> (see translate_table).
> Never blindly trust a tool.
I see, then that cs NULL dereference never happens.
Thanks Bart, I'll drop this patch.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Linux Netfilter Development]
[Linux Kernel Networking Development]
[Linux Networking Development]
[Linux Kernel Development]
[Linux Resources]
[LARTC]
[Bugtraq]
[Consulting]
[Free Internet Dating]
[Yosemite Forum]
[Photo]