Re: ipables and caching

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

On 27/01/2012 13:11, Alex Bligh wrote:

--On 24 January 2012 17:29:35 +0100 Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I have a legacy application which forwards lots of packets (router,
essentially) and uses a lot of sometimes badly written autogenerated
iptables rules (about 3,000 of them).

I am seeing on a good day high route cache efficiency. Do packets
which do not follow the slow path (i.e. cache hits) also cache
what iptables rules they hit? Nothing fancy in use bar conn_track.

Whether the route lookup was satisfied by cache or not  plays no role
for Xtables execution.

Thanks. I don't suppose you know of any work on caching iptables lookups
(which I appreciate is non-trivial to impossible in the general case) or
non-linearising lookups? I am thinking of rules in the FORWARD chain which either select by source prefix or interface (or the destination equivalent) and if the criterion is met, jump to another rule. Currently that search in
linear (i.e. through every rule) which with a large number of
prefixes/interfaces is problematic, but with a btree or similar could be
O(log(n)), and with a hash O(1).

I don't think so, but have you considered adding some optimisation into the auto generated rules? With so many rules there must surely be some low hanging fruit to add some conditional chains to reduce the number of rules hit? ipsets are also a very useful option to collapse certain types of problem into fewer rules?

Good luck

Ed W
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at

[Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Linux Resources]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Consulting]     [Free Internet Dating]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Photo]

Add to Google Powered by Linux