- Subject: Re: ipables and caching
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 17:29:35 +0100 (CET)
- Cc: Mail List - Netfilter <netfilter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <6B9C7F3D35F2987D1BE7DB0B@Ximines.local>
- User-agent: Alpine 2.01 (LNX 1266 2009-07-14)
On Tuesday 2012-01-24 15:28, Alex Bligh wrote:
> I have a legacy application which forwards lots of packets (router,
> essentially) and uses a lot of sometimes badly written autogenerated
> iptables rules (about 3,000 of them).
>
> I am seeing on a good day high route cache efficiency. Do packets
> which do not follow the slow path (i.e. cache hits) also cache
> what iptables rules they hit? Nothing fancy in use bar conn_track.
Whether the route lookup was satisfied by cache or not plays no role
for Xtables execution.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Linux Netfilter Development]
[Linux Kernel Networking Development]
[Linux Networking Development]
[Linux Kernel Development]
[Linux Resources]
[LARTC]
[Bugtraq]
[Consulting]
[Free Internet Dating]
[Yosemite Forum]
[Photo]