Google
  Web www.spinics.net

Re: POM Xtables???

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


On Tuesday 2008-07-01 11:46, Patrick McHardy wrote:

> Jozsef Kadlecsik wrote:
>> On Mon, 30 Jun 2008, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>> 
>> > - LOGMARK - haven't seen it or can't remember
>> 
>> It adds the possibility to log the mark values of the packet/corresponding
>> conntrack entry via syslog. 
>> The feature should simply be added to the LOG target, there's no real point
>> to keep a separated target, as far as I see.
>
> I agree. In fact I already added this to ipt_LOG/ip6t_LOG in
> 2.6.26-rc :)

You only added the nfmark, and it is printed unconditionally at that,
the latter of which I do not see as thrilling. Seems like it is time
for a new revision? Also I think the two modules should be unified
first.

LOGMARK was also instantiated on January 30 already, so that's
prior art here :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [TCP/IP Books]     [Linux Resources]     [LARTC]     [Home]     [Bugtraq]     [Consulting]     [Free Internet Dating]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Photo]

Powered by Linux