|
|
|
Re: ipsets and network namespaces | |
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] |
|
On Mon, 9 Apr 2012, Gao feng wrote:
> ? 2012?04?09? 02:06, Jozsef Kadlecsik ??:
> > On Sun, 8 Apr 2012, Gao feng wrote:
> >
> >> ? 2012?04?05? 19:24, Jozsef Kadlecsik ??:
> >>> On Thu, 5 Apr 2012, Gorik Van Steenberge wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> I've noticed that when creating a new network namespace (using the lxc
> >>>> tools) that ipsets (userspace v6.11 on kernel 3.3.1) are still global,
> >>>> i.e. an ipset created in the container is visible in the host and vice
> >>>> versa. Iptables rulesets, however, are isolated.
> >>>>
> >>>> Is this an as of yet unimplemented feature or a conscious design decision?
> >>>
> >>> It's an unimplemented feature - no one requested it yet ;-).
> >>
> >> And I see there are a lot of /proc/sys/entries are not isolated.
> >> is this an unimplemented feature too?
> >
> > I don't know what you mean here. There's nothing under /proc/sys which is
> > related to ip_set* modules.
>
> I mean proc files such /proc/sys/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_udp_timeout
> are not isolated.
Those have nothing to do with ipset. Please do not "steal" threads, but
start a new one for a new topic.
Best regards,
Jozsef
-
E-mail : kadlec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kadlecsik.jozsef@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
PGP key : http://www.kfki.hu/~kadlec/pgp_public_key.txt
Address : Wigner Research Centre for Physics, Hungarian Academy of Sciences
H-1525 Budapest 114, POB. 49, Hungary
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Netfitler Users] [LARTC] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite Forum] [Photo]