Re: nf_unregister_hook problem

[bcfiss@xxxxxxxxxxxx]

Sorry for duplicates.

--- Em ter, 23/6/09, Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx> escreveu:

> Does the problem go away if you call it indirectly? Like:
>
>
> stop_trigger.function = myfunc;
> ...
>
> myfunc(void)
> {
>     nf_unregister_hook(&nf_hook);
> }


Hi,

I've got a very similar question, about scheduling nf_register_hook,  
and since I'm already calling it indirectly, I think this could prove  
useful to both of us. I'd appreciate if anybody could help.

This is what I'm trying to do:

void foo () {
        unsigned long parameter;
        ...
        DEFINE_TIMER( timer, secfoo, jiffies + 250, parameter);
        ...
        add_timer(timer);
}

void secfoo( unsigned long param ) {
        ...
        nf_register_hook(...);
        ...
}

If I comment the "add_timer(timer);" and put "secfoo( parameter );"  
instead, it works out, though it doesn't help me, because I wanted to  
schedule it. The way it is, I get a kernel panic.

Good day,

Bruno Fiss

----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html