Google
  Web www.spinics.net

Re: [PATCH 1/1] Use RCU for the UDP hash lock

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


Stephen Hemminger wrote:
static inline void udp_lib_unhash(struct sock *sk)
 {
-	write_lock_bh(&udp_hash_lock);
-	if (sk_del_node_init(sk)) {
+	spin_lock_bh(&udp_hash_wlock);
+	if (sk_del_node_rcu(sk)) {
 		inet_sk(sk)->num = 0;
 		sock_prot_inuse_add(sock_net(sk), sk->sk_prot, -1);
 	}
-	write_unlock_bh(&udp_hash_lock);
+	spin_unlock_bh(&udp_hash_wlock);
+	synchronize_sched();

Could this be synchronize_rcu? You are using rcu_read_lock() protected sections.
I meant to comment on that. I wasn't sure which to use, so I chose the more conservative approach. synchronize_rcu() might be appropriate.

-corey

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Kernel List]     [Site Home]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Git]     [IETF Annouce]     [Linux Assembly]     [VLAN]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Rubini]     [Photo]     [Singles Social Netowrking]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Virtualization]     [Linux Security]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Wireless]     [DDR & Rambus]     [Free Dating]     [Linux Resources]     [Wireless Reading Device]

Add to Google Powered by Linux