Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). | |
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] | |
On Fri, 22 Aug 2008 22:45:57 +1000 Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 05:18:41AM -0700, David Miller wrote: > > > > Netem is trying to create packet reordering by requeueing (which is > > logically like a head insert) instead of enqueueing (which is > > logically like a tail insert). > > Why does it use requeue when tfifo's enqueue will insert this > at the front of the queue anyway based on time_to_send anyway? > > Perhaps it's trying to force reordering when the user replaces > tfifo with some other qidsc? But that doesn't make sense since > netem relies on tfifo to implement all the other features such > as delay and jitter. > > So how about > > 1) Change netem_graft to disallow the replacement of tfifo; > 2) Simply use enqueue instead of requeue in netem_enqueue? > > Cheers, Tfifo is there only to add the jitter based reordering. Netem has other better kinds of reordering as well. Netem has to be able to put TBF in as a child qdisc. This is how loss plus rate control is done. Requeue was the natural way to do this based on the API's available at the time. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Kernel List] [Site Home] [Ethernet Bridging] [Git] [IETF Annouce] [Linux Assembly] [VLAN] [Networking] [Security] [Bugtraq] [Rubini] [Photo] [Singles Social Netowrking] [Yosemite] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Virtualization] [Linux Security] [Linux IDE] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Linux Wireless] [DDR & Rambus] [Free Dating] [Linux Resources] [Wireless Reading Device]
![]() |
![]() |