Re: [PATCH 20/38] netns ct: NOTRACK in netns

[Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Friday 2008-08-22 07:30, adobriyan@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
>We wait for untracked ct refcount to drop to 1 back:
>
>	/* wait until all references to nf_conntrack_untracked are dropped */
>	while (atomic_read(&nf_conntrack_untracked.ct_general.use) > 1)
>		schedule();
>
>Consequently it should be one per netns, otherwise netns A can prevent
>netns B from stopping.
>

But nf_conntrack_cleanup is not per netns, is it?
At least I do not think it should be.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html