Re: [PATCH 3/3] pkt_sched: restore multiqueue prio scheduler | |
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] | |
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 9:49 AM, jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sat, 2008-23-08 at 09:31 -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote: > >> Actually in this new multiple tx queue kernel this qdisc could serve a >> very specific but needed purpose which just became apparent to me. >> This qdisc resolves one very specific issue, head-of-line blocking if >> one of the hardware queues is full. What if I reversed things a bit >> in prio_classify so that skb->queue_mapping determined the band >> instead of the other way around in the case of the multiqueue option >> being enabled? I would think that in this configuration the qdisc >> would prove to be pretty useful for purposes other than QOS since it >> would allow a classful qdisc per transmit queue instead of per device. >> > > i think thats whats Dave is saying not in so many words. > > prio_classify calls classifiers. > dont modify the qdisc; rather do a classification which when matched > sets skb->queue_mapping to a value your policy likes it to be. > you dont need a new classifier, u32 would do for example. or ematch if > you want to do some funky things. you will need a new action which sets > the skb->queue_mapping. We have to modify the existing prio qdisc or create a new qdisc in order to resolve the head-of-line blocking once any of the queues have stopped. The new one wouldn't make any changes to the priority of the packet but instead would only switch it to a separate qdisc based on the queue_mapping of the skb. I get the fact that all we would need is a new action to handle the queue mapping, but in order for that to be an acceptable solution I still need the qdisc changes. >> I could then create a select_queue for the device that returns 0 when >> in DCB/EEDC mode for our drivers, implement the tc action to set the >> queue mapping, and have essentially the same result as I had before. >> > put overflow queues in your driver. With the new multiq approach the > controls are per-queue not per driver. > I think you missed the email from Dave earlier, either that or I am not understanding something and if I am feel free to explain. My understanding is that when we assign a new qdisc via tc the qdisc/transmit queues end up with a configuration kind of like what Dave has on slide 7 at (http://vger.kernel.org/~davem/davem_seattle08.pdf). Adding more queues doesn't resolve anything since I am still going through the same qdisc regardless of how many queues I have. The changes to the dequeue portion of this qdisc are the most important part for this change since I need them to keep the qdisc from jamming up in a dequeue/requeue loop if the packet at the head of the qdisc needs to go to a stopped hardware transmit queue. > cheers, > jamal > Thanks, Alex -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Kernel List] [Site Home] [Ethernet Bridging] [Git] [IETF Annouce] [Linux Assembly] [VLAN] [Networking] [Security] [Bugtraq] [Rubini] [Photo] [Singles Social Netowrking] [Yosemite] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Virtualization] [Linux Security] [Linux IDE] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Linux Wireless] [DDR & Rambus] [Free Dating] [Linux Resources] [Wireless Reading Device]
![]() |
![]() |