Re: [PATCH net-next 0/9] selective (per/namespace) flush of rt_cache | |
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] | |
On Sat, 2008-07-05 at 20:55 -0700, David Miller wrote: > From: "Denis V. Lunev" <den@xxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Fri, 04 Jul 2008 17:16:00 +0400 > > > This series of patches implements selective rt cache flushing to make > > sure that in one namespace we'll not been able to affect the performance > > of other from the user space. > > Applied and pushed out to net-next-2.6, thanks. > > Although I wish patch 9 didn't have to be so ugly. :-/ Also, is it > really the right thing to do if another namespace's RT cache entries > are in fact chewing up all the slots in a hash chain? I think > the replacement garbage collection algorithm should be namespace > agnostic. hmmm... it looks like a name rt_is_expired is not good enough for the case. May be rt_is_flushed should be better? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Kernel List] [Site Home] [Ethernet Bridging] [Git] [IETF Annouce] [Linux Assembly] [VLAN] [Networking] [Security] [Bugtraq] [Rubini] [Photo] [Yosemite] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Virtualization] [Linux Security] [Linux IDE] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Linux Wireless] [DDR & Rambus] [Free Dating] [Linux Resources] [Wireless Reading Device]
![]() |
![]() |