Google
  Web www.spinics.net

Re: [PATCH net-next 0/9] selective (per/namespace) flush of rt_cache

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


On Sat, 2008-07-05 at 20:55 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: "Denis V. Lunev" <den@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Fri, 04 Jul 2008 17:16:00 +0400
> 
> > This series of patches implements selective rt cache flushing to make
> > sure that in one namespace we'll not been able to affect the performance
> > of other from the user space.
> 
> Applied and pushed out to net-next-2.6, thanks.
> 
> Although I wish patch 9 didn't have to be so ugly. :-/ Also, is it
> really the right thing to do if another namespace's RT cache entries
> are in fact chewing up all the slots in a hash chain?  I think
> the replacement garbage collection algorithm should be namespace
> agnostic.

hmmm... it looks like a name rt_is_expired is not good enough for the
case. May be rt_is_flushed should be better?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Kernel List]     [Site Home]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Git]     [IETF Annouce]     [Linux Assembly]     [VLAN]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Rubini]     [Photo]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Virtualization]     [Linux Security]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Wireless]     [DDR & Rambus]     [Free Dating]     [Linux Resources]     [Wireless Reading Device]

Add to Google Powered by Linux