Re: [RFC] support for IEEE 1588 | |
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] | |
Rick Jones <rick.jones2@xxxxxx> writes: > > I've not had a good emily litella moment in at least a week, so I'll > ask - if the clock in the hardware generating the timestamp and the > clock in the host aren't synchronized in _some_ way, what benefit is > there to putting the hardware's timestamp in there? The point is to synchronize them using a high quality data stamp. -Andi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Kernel List] [Site Home] [Ethernet Bridging] [Git] [IETF Annouce] [Linux Assembly] [VLAN] [Networking] [Security] [Bugtraq] [Rubini] [Photo] [Yosemite] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Virtualization] [Linux Security] [Linux IDE] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Linux Wireless] [DDR & Rambus] [Free Dating] [Linux Resources] [Wireless Reading Device]
![]() |
![]() |