Re: [PATCH 02/10] Preparatory refactoring part 2. | |
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] | |
Corey Hickey wrote:
> The sfq_destroy() --> sfq_q_destroy() change looks pointless here,
> but it's cleaner to split now and add code to sfq_q_destroy() in a
> later patch.
>
> +static void sfq_destroy(struct Qdisc *sch)
> +{
> + struct sfq_sched_data *q = qdisc_priv(sch);
> + sfq_q_destroy(q);
> +}
It does look pointless, after applying all patches sfq_destroy still
remains a simply wrapper around sfq_q_destroy.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Kernel List] [Site Home] [Ethernet Bridging] [Git] [IETF Annouce] [Linux Assembly] [VLAN] [Networking] [Security] [Bugtraq] [Rubini] [Photo] [Singles Social Netowrking] [Yosemite] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Virtualization] [Linux Security] [Linux IDE] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Linux Wireless] [DDR & Rambus] [Free Dating] [Linux Resources] [Wireless Reading Device]
|
|