Google
  Web www.spinics.net

Re: bind and O_NONBLOCK

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 22:59:53 -0700

> It would be ideal if we'd have such an implementation in the next few
> months so that we, in theory, can check whether the text in the
> specification makes sense.

It seems this functionality is only relevant for really ancient
protocols such as netbeui, as Alan mentioned.

The implementation would go in those protocols, the code for
which hasn't been touched substantially for years.  It is
unclear whether those protocols are even functional at this
time. :-)

So expecting an implementation in the next few months depends
upon someone standing up and actively working on those rotting
code bases.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Kernel List]     [Site Home]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Git]     [IETF Annouce]     [Linux Assembly]     [VLAN]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Rubini]     [Photo]     [Singles Social Netowrking]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Virtualization]     [Linux Security]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Wireless]     [DDR & Rambus]     [Free Dating]     [Linux Resources]     [Wireless Reading Device]

Add to Google Powered by Linux