Hi Jean, the at86rf230 driver supports several at86rf2xx chips. You split the at86rf212_set_channel which is at86rf212 specific in two function which are named at86rf230_foo. Sorry, but I think we should not do this. One reason is that the code is much easier to read when we have one channel_set callback for at86rf23x and at86rf212 chips. Btw. I preparing a big cleanup for this driver which supports regmap and asychronous handling for rx/tx paths. - Alex -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html