|
|
Re: [PATCH 1/2] ipv6: do not hold route table lock when send ndisc probe |
Thanks for the patch. We're discussing how to reach to this code properly in the lab now. Although we will probably have to modify so it's compliant with the RFC, by checking if a ndisc_send_ns() has already been queued within rt->rt6i_idev->cnf.rtr_probe_interval, otherwise it could flood the network with neighbor discoveries. -Debabrata On 8/20/12 11:44 PM, "Cong Wang" <amwang@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >Hi, Debabrata, > >Could you help to test the attached patch below? > >Thanks! > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Linux Kernel Discussion] [Ethernet Bridging] [Linux Wireless Networking] [Linux Bluetooth Networking] [Linux Networking Users] [VLAN] [Git] [IETF Annouce] [Linux Assembly] [Security] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Singles Social Networking] [Yosemite Information] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux Kernel] [ARM Linux] [Linux Virtualization] [Linux Security] [Linux IDE] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Free Dating]
![]() |
![]() |