|
|
Re: [patch net-next 01/16] net: introduce upper device lists |
Le 13/08/2012 19:31, Jiri Pirko a écrit :
Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 07:04:11PM CEST, bhutchings@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
+struct netdev_upper { + struct net_device *dev; + bool unique;This needs a better name. It doesn't really have anything to do with uniqueness and doesn't ensure exclusivity. I think that it would be fine to keep the 'master' term.Hmm. I admit that "unique" I do not like too much as well. But "master" I like even less. This flag should ensure exclusivity. Only one upper device with this flag can be present at a time.
Well, can't we simply call it "upper_device"? And as we only have a single field, this is exclusive by design. Nicolas. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Linux Kernel Discussion] [Ethernet Bridging] [Linux Wireless Networking] [Linux Bluetooth Networking] [Linux Networking Users] [VLAN] [Git] [IETF Annouce] [Linux Assembly] [Security] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Singles Social Networking] [Yosemite Information] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux Kernel] [ARM Linux] [Linux Virtualization] [Linux Security] [Linux IDE] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Free Dating]
![]() |
![]() |