Re: [PATCH 00/16] generic hashtable implementation |
|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/16] generic hashtable implementation
- From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 14:16:14 -0400
- Cc: torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, tj@xxxxxxxxxx, akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx, paul.gortmaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx, mingo@xxxxxxx, ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx, aarcange@xxxxxxxxxx, ericvh@xxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, josh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, eric.dumazet@xxxxxxxxx, mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxxxx, axboe@xxxxxxxxx, agk@xxxxxxxxxx, dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx, neilb@xxxxxxx, ccaulfie@xxxxxxxxxx, teigland@xxxxxxxxxx, Trond.Myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx, fweisbec@xxxxxxxxx, jesse@xxxxxxxxxx, venkat.x.venkatsubra@xxxxxxxxxx, ejt@xxxxxxxxxx, snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx, edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-nfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, rds-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, lw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <1344961490-4068-1-git-send-email-levinsasha928@gmail.com>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 06:24:34PM +0200, Sasha Levin wrote:
> SUNRPC/cache: use new hashtable implementation
..
> lockd: use new hashtable implementation
FWIW, these look fine (and I ran them through some nfs tests and didn't
see any problems).
--b.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Linux Kernel Discussion]
[Ethernet Bridging]
[Linux Wireless Networking]
[Linux Bluetooth Networking]
[Linux Networking Users]
[VLAN]
[Git]
[IETF Annouce]
[Linux Assembly]
[Security]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Singles Social Networking]
[Yosemite Information]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux Kernel]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Virtualization]
[Linux Security]
[Linux IDE]
[Linux RAID]
[Linux SCSI]
[Free Dating]
