Re: [RFC] NETDEV_UNREGISTER_BATCH seems unused nowaday ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

On Fri, 2012-08-10 at 03:42 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 11:27:04 +0200
> 
> > NETDEV_UNREGISTER_BATCH seems unused we can probably remove it.
> 
> Indeed, the routing cache was the final real user.
> 
> > I am tracking a device refcount issue, delaying net device dismantle by
> > 1 second in netdev_wait_allrefs()
> > 
> > I guess we need to add a notifier called _after_ the final
> > synchronize_net() in rollback_registered_many()
> 
> It's essentially caused by DST_GC_INC, right?

No, we in fact need a rcu_barrier(), then another call to
dst_dev_event().

rcu_barrier() is needed so that in-flight call_rcu() of routes (from
rt_free()) are completed. Or else we miss these dst in the
dst_dev_event().

I have a working patch, adding the rcu_barrier() and one additional
NETDEV_UNREGISTER_FINAL event.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Linux Kernel Discussion]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Linux Bluetooth Networking]     [Linux Networking Users]     [VLAN]     [Git]     [IETF Annouce]     [Linux Assembly]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Singles Social Networking]     [Yosemite Information]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux Kernel]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Virtualization]     [Linux Security]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Free Dating]

Add to Google Powered by Linux