Re: [PATCH] net: fib: fix incorrect call_rcu_bh()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

On Tue, 2012-08-07 at 09:34 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 07, 2012 at 12:47:11PM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > After IP route cache removal, I believe rcu_bh() has very little use and
> > we should remove this RCU variant, since it adds some cycles in fast
> > path.
> 
> Do you mean remove all uses of RCU-bh globally and also removing the
> implementation itself?  That would actually be a good thing, from my
> perspective.
> 

Yes I meant that there are now too few rcu_bh users, and that they
probably could switch to regular rcu.

We could then remove the implementation.

rcu_bh was needed because we could sit forever in softirq mode in one
cpu, and we needed to allocate/free dsts with RCU protection.



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Linux Kernel Discussion]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Linux Bluetooth Networking]     [Linux Networking Users]     [VLAN]     [Git]     [IETF Annouce]     [Linux Assembly]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Singles Social Networking]     [Yosemite Information]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux Kernel]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Virtualization]     [Linux Security]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Free Dating]

Add to Google Powered by Linux