|
|
Re: [PATCH net-next] igb: use build_skb() |
On 08/06/2012 11:21 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote: > On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 10:35 -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote: > >> I was planning to move igb over to an ixgbe style receive path at some >> point anyway. Since it seems like this is now a higher priority I >> figured I would try to get the patches for it implemented in the next >> week or so. Would there be any issue with us rejecting this patch and >> instead switching igb over to the ixgbe style path? > It seems I missed this part. > > I use igb on my dev machine, not on prod machines, so if you are moving > igb to ixgbe, I can certainly can maintain my patch in my tree, while > you make your changes. > I'll try to get the coding for this finished up this week and I can probably send you a copy of the patches as an RFC. We will do testing and hopefully we can have the patches pushed to net-next for 3.7. Thanks, Alex -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Linux Kernel Discussion] [Ethernet Bridging] [Linux Wireless Networking] [Linux Bluetooth Networking] [Linux Networking Users] [VLAN] [Git] [IETF Annouce] [Linux Assembly] [Security] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Singles Social Networking] [Yosemite Information] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux Kernel] [ARM Linux] [Linux Virtualization] [Linux Security] [Linux IDE] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Free Dating]
![]() |
![]() |