|
|
Re: [PATCH 1/8] netpoll: use GFP_ATOMIC in slave_enable_netpoll() and __netpoll_setup() |
On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 22:23 +0800, Cong Wang wrote: > slave_enable_netpoll() and __netpoll_setup() may be called > with read_lock() held, so should use GFP_ATOMIC to allocate > memory. Eric suggested to pass gfp flags to __netpoll_setup(). > > Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <amwang@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- You based this on net-next, but didnt add the net-next suffix in your [PATCH ...] description. Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Linux Kernel Discussion] [Ethernet Bridging] [Linux Wireless Networking] [Linux Bluetooth Networking] [Linux Networking Users] [VLAN] [Git] [IETF Annouce] [Linux Assembly] [Security] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Singles Social Networking] [Yosemite Information] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux Kernel] [ARM Linux] [Linux Virtualization] [Linux Security] [Linux IDE] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Free Dating]
|
|